Australian Government - Bureau of Meteorology Home | About Us | Contacts | Help | Feedback |

Global | Australia | NSW | Vic. | Qld | WA | SA | Tas. | ACT | NT | Ant. |

Weather & Warnings | Hydrology | Climate | Numerical Prediction | About Services | Learn About Meteorology | Registered User Services |

Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre link image

ROLE AND OBJECTIVES ORGANISATION ANNUAL REPORT EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS NEWS AND EVENTS PUBLICATIONS

Global Guide
Main Menu

Global Guide to Tropical Cyclone Forecasting:
CHAPTER 8: NUMERICAL TRACK PREDICTION MODELS


8.3 Operational Numerical Models

Operational numerical models provide track forecast guidance that is comparable with other techniques. These systems also have the potential for markedly increased forecast accuracy as current research is transformed into model improvements. The main features of a number of current systems are provided here to help forecasters interpret the forecast output. A detailed survey is provided by Elsberry (1993), and current information from forecast centres is provided by WMO (1993). The information is valid as of mid-1993. Because of the rapidly changing nature of operational numerical modelling, the information in this sections will change and readers should consult the relevant literature for current information.

 

8.3.1 Global Models

Global models have attained resolutions where the outer circulations of small-scale systems such as tropical cyclones are resolved. Table 8.1 lists the characteristics of several widely available global models in 1993. Note that all centres except the UKMO use spectral models.

Parameterisation of physical processes in various degrees of detail are carried out by all global models (Table 8.2). All models include cumulus-convection parameterisation, large-scale condensation, surface fluxes, a detailed planetary boundary layer, diagnostic clouds, radiative transfer, ground hydrology and horizontal and vertical diffusion. Improvements in the parameterisation of physical processes have had a significant impact on the performance of the models in the tropics (Tiedtke et al., 1988) and for tropical cyclones (Bender et al., 1987; Bender and Kurihara, 1987; Puri and Miller, 1990a,b).

 

Table 8.1: Features of operational global numbeical models.
  VERTICAL LEVELS HORIZONTAL RESOLUTION PHYSICS GRID TIME INTEGRATION
CENTRE
UKMO 20 0.83°lat
1.25°long
0.83°lat
1.25°long
Split-explicit
JMA 21 T106
(1.12°)
130km
Semi-implicit
US NMC 18 T126
(0.94°)
105 km
Semi-implicit
ECMWF
Miller (1992)
31 T213
(0.56°)
65 km
Semi-Lagrangian
FNOC
Goerss and   Jeffries (1993)
18 T79
(1.5°)
1.5°lat
Semi-implicit

 

Table 8.2: Physcial processes in operational global models.
CENTRE CONVECTION SURFACE FLUX LAYER
JMA Kuo Monin-Obhukov
US NMC Kuo, Shallow convection, Large-scale condensation Monin-Obhukov (stability dependant)
ECMWF Miller (1992) Mass flux, large-scale condensation Monin-Obhukov (stability dependant)
FNOC Goerss and Jeffries (1993) Arakawa Schubert,  Large-scale condensation  

 

All centres also use some form of data assimilation. ECMWF, JMA and NMC use intermittent assimilation (Section 8.2.3) with an analysis performed at 6-h intervals. The UKMO uses continuous data assimilation with observations inserted as they occur.

There are no comprehensive evaluations comparing all global models on homogeneous data sets, but the impression from recent studies (Goerss and Jeffries, 1993; Fiorino et al., 1993: Miller, 1992; Shun, 1992; Muroi and Sato, 1992) is that all global models are producing useful forecast guidance on tropical cyclone tracks (eg Table 8.3). Only the UKMO provides track forecasts in routine, twice daily tropical bulletins during the southern hemisphere tropical season to WMO RA5 members (Table 1.1).

 

Table 8.3: Comparison of 12 to 48-h forecast errors (nm and km) for a homogeneous set of forecasts from the specified JMA model and from persistence (PER).
  12h 24h 36h 48h
TYM 54 101 103 191 151 282 213 397
ASM 75 139 119 222 173 323 235 439
GSM 89 166 140 262 190 354 282 525
PER 28 52 86 160 160 299 263 489
Sample size 61   59   51   46  

 

8.3.2 Limited Area Models

Even with the improved performance for global models, most operational centres continue to use limited area models for tropical cyclone prediction, especially because of the higher resolution that can be obtained and the earlier availability of forecasts. In this section, we describe the basic features of limited area tropical cyclone prediction models used for tropical cyclone prediction at the JMA, FNOC, US NMC and Australian NMC (Tables 8.4, 8.5).

Detailed information on TYM is given by Iwasaki et al. (1987). An important component of the initial condition is that bogussing is used to define the circulation in the region around the reported position of the cyclone. Whenever a cyclone is expected to affect the area of responsibility, two 60h forecasts are made operationally with TYM, based on initial data at 0000 and 1200 UTC.

A number of case studies using TYM and other JMA models (Ueno, 1989) indicate that the size of the forecast domain, horizontal resolution and the convection scheme have a significant impact on the cyclone track forecasts. Moreover, studies indicate that careful specification of the asymmetric part of the bogus is important for track forecasts. TYM contains a clear tendency for cyclones to drift poleward relative to observed tracks.

As with the TYM, an important component of NORAPS is the use of bogussing in developing a tropical cyclone structure in the initial analysis. A notable feature is the use of a 12-h data assimilation cycle.

 

Table 8.4: Features of operational limited-area track-prediction models.
CENTRE VERTICAL LEVELS HORIZONTAL RESOLUTION TIME INTEGR. BOUNDARY CONDITION
JMA, TYM
Tatsumi (1986)
8 50 km
(5400x5400 km)
Semi-Implicit 1-way, Global, 12-h update
FNOC, NORAPS Hodur (1987) 12 12 Variable, by basin
80-130 km
(109x82 grid points)
Split- Explicit Perkey-Kreitsberg
   NOGAPS.
US NMC, QLM Mathur, (1991) 16 40 km
(4400x4400 km)
Quasi-Lagrangian 1-way, Global
Aus NMC, TAPS
Puri et al. (1992)
8 100 km
(45°x45°)
Semi-Implicit 1-way, Global
12-h update

 

Table 8.5: Physical processes in operational limited area models.
CENTRE CONVECTION SURFACE FLUXES
JMA, TYM Iwasaki et al. Kuo with large-scale condensation Bulk over ocean, only (1986) momentum over land
FNOC, NORAPS Kuo with large scale condensation Monin- Obhukov
US NMC, QLM Mathur (1991) Kuo with large- scale condensation Bulk over ocean, none over land
Aus NMC, TAPS Puri et al. (1992) Kuo with large- scale condensation Bulk

 

A distinguishing feature of the QLM is that the time derivative following the horizontal motion of an air parcel is evaluated by using the so-called quasi-Lagrangian method. The total acceleration and the nonlinear advective terms are therefore evaluated to a higher order of accuracy. As with the models at other centres, a bogus vortex is used in the QLM with the initial grided data (without the prescribed vortex) given by NMC's Aviation (AVN) operational initialised analysis. The recent performance of QLM in forecasting North Atlantic tropical cyclones (Table 8.6) provides a general indication of the capacity of regional models generally.

TAPS also uses bogus moisture data and a bogus tropical cyclone, which is inserted into the analysis as observations. Another feature is the use of dynamical nudging, as described in Section 8.2.3, during which diabatic heating estimated from Japanese GMS imagery is used to develop realistic vertical motion in the initial state.

 

Table 8.6: Comparison of 12 to 72-h forecast errors (km) for a homogeneous set of forecasts from the QLM, NHC90 and CLIPER during the 1990 North-Atlantic hurricane season (Mathur and Ruess, 1993).
  12 24 36 48 72
QLM 117 194 265 312 431
NHC90 107 181 291 396 663
CLIPER 115 224 357 474 761
Sample Size 111 101 88 77 56

 


Contents Chapter 9



  Bureau Home   ||   BMRC Home  ||  Search  ||  Contact BMRC Webmaster


© Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2008, Bureau of Meteorology (ABN 92 637 533 532)
Please note the Copyright Notice and Disclaimer statements relating to the use of the information on this site and our site Privacy and Accessibility statements. Users of these web pages are deemed to have read and accepted the conditions described in the Copyright, Disclaimer, and Privacy statements. Please also note the Acknowledgement notice relating to the use of information on this site. No unsolicited commercial email.