Murray–Darling Basin

                                                                                                   

8.1.3.6 Allocation on regulated flows remaining – general and low-security, other lumped holders

                             

Supporting information   


The volumetric value for the line item at the end of 2009–10 is 1,135,281 ML. The following table provides a breakdown of the volumes.

Allocation remaining within the Murray–Darling Basin (MDB) region – general and low-security, other lumped holders

Region no.

Region name

State

Volume as at
30 June 2009

(ML)

Volume as at
30 June 2010

(ML)

5

Border Rivers

Qld/NSW

53,127

28,359

5.1

Border Rivers – Qld

Qld

n/a

n/a

5.2

Border Rivers – NSW

NSW

53,127

28,359

6

Gwydir

NSW

34,652

10,750

7

Namoi

NSW

62,188

38,282

8

Macquarie–Castlereagh

NSW

79,580

41,240

10

Lower Darling

NSW

4,603

12,197

11

Lachlan

NSW

33,333

33,800

14

Goulburn–Broken

Vic

15

Loddon

Vic

16

Campaspe

Vic

17

Murrumbidgee

NSW/ACT

220,602

480,580

17.1

Murrumbidgee – NSW

NSW

220,602

480,580

17.2

Murrumbidgee – ACT

ACT

18

Murray

NSW/Vic/SA

171,218

490,073

18.1

Murray – NSW

NSW

171,218

490,073

18.2

Murray – Vic

Vic

18.3

Murray – SA

SA

 

Total

 

659,302

1,135,281

– = no data available; n/a = not applicable

New South Wales volumes include the licence class of general security allocation remaining:

  • for bulk (i.e. within a trust) and individual irrigation
  • for environment
  • where the purpose is generally not known.

No information specific to this entitlement class available for Victoria. See Line item 8.1.9.7 Allocation on regulated flows remaining – other lumped holders for data on all classes lumped together.

In Queensland, the resource operation plans (ROPs) distinguish between ‘high and medium priority of supplemented water allocation’ (names used in Queensland, corresponding to high and general/low-security classes of water access entitlements, respectively, in the National Water Account 2010, or the 2010 Account). In most cases, what the ROPs classify as high priority actually corresponds to urban purpose. The water audit monitoring (WAM) data, however, only distinguish between ‘supplemented’ and ‘unsupplemented’ entitlements, distinguishing for ‘supplemented’ only, urban purpose from all other purposes. For this reason, the 2010 Account reports all ‘supplemented’ entitlements in Queensland under ‘other lumped WAE’ class. The 2010 Account further splits Queensland ‘supplemented’ entitlements between urban purpose, reported under ‘urban holder’ (Line item 8.1.9.4), and all other purposes, reported under ‘individual irrigator holder’ (Line item 8.1.9.2) and ‘other lumped holders’ (Line item 8.1.9.7).

No other state has high or general/low-security classes of entitlements.

Quantification approach   


Data source

Australian Capital Territory: Water Audit Monitoring Report 2009–10 (30 November 2010).

New South Wales: NSW Office of Water’s Water Accounting section.

Queensland: Water Audit Monitoring Report 2009–10 (31 January 2011).

South Australia: Water Audit Monitoring Report 2009–10 (22 February 2011).

Victoria: Water Audit Monitoring Report 2009–10 (19 January 2011).

Note: Water audit monitoring report (WAM) data are stored in the Murray–Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) HYDRO database.

Data provider

MDBA.

Method

Water sharing plans, water resource plans and the water legislation of each state specify:

  • the classes of licences that are permitted to carry forward any unused volumes
  • rules attached to the volume that may be carried forward.

Allocation remaining (carryover) is calculated by the states and provided to the MDBA.

Uncertainty

The uncertainty estimate for the values provided in the line item is +/–10%.

Approximations, assumptions, caveats/limitations

  • Victorian and Queensland WAM data received by MDBA did not allow separation into high and general/low-security classes; therefore, this item contains only New South Wales data.