Sydney

   

Quantification approach  

Quantification approaches are provided separately for the following inputs used to calculate outflow to the sea:

 

Quantification approach for rule-based environmental flow releases

 

Data source

Daily Return System (DRS) database.

 

Data provider

The Sydney Catchment Authority.

 

Method

Known release rates from flow meters, orifice plates, valves with rating tables or measured outlets were used to derive the volume.

 

Uncertainty

The volume is based on measured data. Estimated uncertainty based on meter accuracy, and professional judgment on rating tables and site configuration issues is +/–10%.

 

Approximations, assumptions, caveats/limitations

Nil.

 

Quantification approach for unspecified releases and spills from reservoirs and weirs to downstream rivers

 

Data source

Agency Data source
The Bureau of Meteorology

Spilling volume from Danjera Reservoir for 2009–10 was estimated using the following input data:

  • estimated precipitation and evaporation, and modelled inflow to Danjera Reservoir using Bureau of Meteorology data
  • storage volumes of the reservoir provided by Shoalhaven City Council (source: Level monitoring at the reservoirs with hydrometric sensors linking to council’s radio telemetry system)
  • diversions and other losses for the reservoir provided by Shoalhaven City Council (source: Shoalhaven City Council Telemetry System and daily data registers in respect of the operations of water treatment plants).
The Sydney Catchment Authority Sydney Catchment Authority Hydstra system and Daily Return System (DRS) databases

 

 

Data provider

Agency Data provider
The Bureau of Meteorology Spilling volume from Danjera Reservoir
The Sydney Catchment Authority Spilling volumes and other releases from the storage reservoirs and weirs managed by the authority

 

 

Method

Agency Method
The Bureau of Meteorology Reservoir mass balance calculations using measured storage volumes, estimated precipitation and evaporation, and modelled run-off
The Sydney Catchment Authority Spill volumes derived from water levels and rating tables for spillways

 


 

Uncertainty

Agency Uncertainty
The Bureau of Meteorology The volume was estimated from measured and modelled data. Estimated uncertainties for some of the inputs used for the calculation of spilling volume from Danjera Reservoir are ungraded. These inputs are precipitation, evaporation and modelled run-off. Therefore, uncertainty for the spilling volume from Danjera Reservoir is ungraded. Estimated uncertainty for storage volume, which was the remaining input for the calculation, is +/–5%.
The Sydney Catchment Authority The volume is based on measured data. Estimated uncertainty based on meter accuracy, and professional judgment on rating tables, site configuration issues and local issues at the time of spilling at each site is +/–5% to +/–10%.

 

 

Approximations, assumptions, caveats/limitations

Agency Approximations, assumptions, caveats/limitations
The Bureau of Meteorology

Based on data provided by Shoalhaven City Council, water was not supplied from Danjera Reservoir during 2009–10. Reservoir losses other than spills have been assumed as negligible. For other approximations and assumptions, see the following line items:

  • 13.1 for precipitation 
  • 13.4.1 for inflow 
  • 14.1 for evaporation.
The Sydney Catchment Authority Nil.

 

Quantification approach for natural streamflows in gauged streams

 

 

Data source

Stream gauge data from the Hydstra system.

 

Data provider

The Sydney Catchment Authority.

 

Method

River levels are gauged and converted to a flow rate using a rating table. Rating tables are updated by manual stream gauging.

Some of the gauging sites have been linked to the Sydney Catchment Authority’s (SCA) radio telemetry system so that gauging data are readily available. For the other sites, data are downloaded to SCA’s Hydstra system in regular intervals from logged data at the site.

 

Uncertainty

The volume is based on measured data. Estimated uncertainty based on measurement accuracy and professional judgment on rating tables is +/–10% to +/–50%, depending on the site characteristics and flow rate.

 

Approximations, assumptions, caveats/limitations

Nil.

 

Quantification approach for natural streamflows in ungauged streams

 

Data source

The Bureau of Meteorology modelled the landscape water balance to estimate inflows using following data sources:

 

Data provider

The Bureau of Meteorology (the Bureau)

 

Method

The Bureau calculated natural streamflow for the following ungauged and tidal rivers:

Natural river flow in the river reaches is based on landscape water draining into the rivers modelled by the Bureau (see the method described for run-off to Line item 13.4.1 River reaches not within SCA operational area and the reservoirs).

 

Uncertainty

The volume is based on modelled and estimated data. Uncertainty is ungraded.

 

Approximations, assumptions, caveats/limitations

See in Line item 13.4.1 River reaches not within SCA operational area and the reservoirs.

 

Quantification approach for treated water releases from wastewater treatment plants

See Line item 13.7.1 Urban wastewater discharge to connected surface water and Line item 13.7.2 Urban recycled water discharge to connected surface water.

 

Quantification approach for downstream diversions from flow leading to sea

See the following: