Daly
Water accounting policies

a. Introduction

The information presented in the Daly region water accounting report is based on agreements between the Department of Land Resource Management, Power and Water Corporation and the Bureau of Meteorology.

The report has been prepared using an accrual basis of water accounting, with the exception of the water flow information. The water attribute being quantified is volume and the unit of account is megalitres (ML). Where a reported volume is negative, it is shown in brackets.


b. Recognition of water assets and water liabilities

Only water that is held or managed by the state licensing authority or the urban utilities and is part of the entitlement system is defined as a water asset. Provided its volume can be quantified in a way that is complete, neutral and free from material error, the volume of the water asset or water liability is recognised in the Statement of Water Assets and Water Liabilities.

Water held in storages that has already been abstracted from the entitlement system is deemed not to be part of the region (no matter their size or connection to the system). This is because the attendant water right has already been exercised. 


c. Recognition of changes in water assets and water liabilities

The increases and decreases to the reported water assets and water liabilities consist of changes that can be quantified in a way that is complete, neutral and free from material error. These volumes are presented in the Statement of Changes in Water Assets and Water Liabilities and the Statement of Water Flows.

Precipitation and evaporation are recognised only in relation to the surfaces of open storage volumes (9.1 Precipitation on surface water and 17.1 Evaporation from surface water). They do not represent all precipitation, evaporation and evapotranspiration within the region (notably, these processes occurring from the landscape are not captured).

That portion of runoff that flows into the surface water store (storages and rivers) is quantified and recognised on the Statement of Changes in Water Assets and Water Liabilities. This runoff includes precipitation captured in the catchment less evaporation and infiltration and is recorded as 9.4 Runoff to surface water.

Allocation announcements on regulated entitlements have been recognised as an increase in water liabilities. Note that the definition of regulated or unregulated entitlements for the purpose of the National Water Account (refer to Glossary) may be different to the meaning applied by the jurisdiction. Please refer to the Water rights, entitlements, allocations and restrictions note for more information on allocations.


d. Water assets and water liabilities that fail the recognition criteria

The volumes of several water assets and water liabilities identified in the Daly region were not reported in the water accounting statements but replaced by dashes ('–') as they 'failed the recognition criteria' specified in the Australian Water Accounting Standard 1, because:

  • they could not be quantified in a way that is complete, neutral and free from material error
  • in the case of water assets, they were unlikely to provide a future benefit to the region or the region's stakeholders
  • in the case of water liabilities, they were unlikely to result in a decrease in the region's water assets or an increase in another water liability when the obligation is discharged.

The descriptions of those water assets and water liabilities that failed the recognition criteria are given in the following line item notes:

e. Changes to water assets and water liabilities that fail the recognition criteria

The volumes of several changes to water assets and water liabilities identified in the Daly region were not reported in the water accounting statements but replaced by dashes ('–') as they 'failed the recognition criteria' specified in the Australian Water Accounting Standard 1, because:

  • they could not be quantified in a way that is complete, neutral and free from material error
  • in the case of changes to water assets, they were unlikely to provide a future benefit to the region or the region's stakeholders
  • in the case of changes to water liabilities, they were unlikely to result in a decrease in the region's water assets or an increase in another water liability when the obligation is discharged.

The descriptions of those changes to water assets and water liabilities that failed the recognition criteria are given in the following line item notes: