Burdekin: Methods

Summary of methods
Table N4 outlines the methods used to derive the item volumes for the Burdekin region. For a more detailed description of the method, click on the relevant item name in the table.
Table N4 Methods used to derive item volumes
Approach or data used | Item | Source |
Water storage product data | Storages | Bureau of Meteorology |
Not quantified |
|
Approach or data used | Item | Source |
Water resourcing licence database and annual reports/meter readings | SunWater and Department of Natural Resources and Mines |
Approach or data used | Item | Source |
Stream monitoring data | Outflow | Department of Natural Resources and Mines and Bureau of Meteorology |
Stream monitoring data and AWRA-L model | Runoff | Bureau of Meteorology |
Gridded climate data | Bureau of Meteorology | |
Operational Data Storage System: metered data | Lower Burdekin Water | |
Not quantified |
|
Approach or data used | Item | Source |
Water resourcing licence database and annual reports/meter readings | SunWater and Department of Natural Resources and Mines | |
Operational Data Storage System: metered data | Allocated diversion: urban system | SunWater |
Detail of methods
Water storage product data
Storages
Storage volume at the start and end of the year was calculated using water level data (metres above Australian Height Datum) collected at each storage. Capacity tables established for each storage were used to convert the height measurement to a volume.
The volume of individual storages was aggregated to present the total volume as detailed in the surface water note. The uncertainty range for these volumes is +/–5%.
The assumptions made were as follows:
- Storage–volume curves represent specifically surveyed parts of the storage and may not reflect the storage–volume relationship across the entire storage.
- Storages are subject to sedimentation and other physical changes over time, which in turn affects the accuracy of the storage–volume curves.
Stream monitoring data
Outflow
There are three rivers that flow out to sea from the Burdekin region. The total river outflow was established using flow data collected at the most downstream gauging stations nearest to the outlet to the sea (Figure N1):
- Burdekin River at Clare (Station 120006B)
- Haughton River at Powerline (Station119003A)
- Barratta Creek at Northcote (Station 119101A).
Figure N1 Gauging stations used to calculate total outflow to sea
The river outflow was estimated using flow data collected at the most downstream gauging station (nearest to the outlet to the sea) along a river. These data were converted to daily volume data (ML) to determine the total annual discharge (in ML) at each station during the year.
It is assumed that the river outflow to the sea is equal to the volume of discharge measured at the most downstream station along a river, that is, there is no adjustment made for the contributing area below the gauging station used to calculate the outflow.
Quality codes are assigned to flow data in accordance with Table N5, as given in the Bureau of Meteorology's Water Data Online.
Quality code | Description |
A | The record set is the best available given the technologies, techniques and monitoring objectives at the time of classification |
B | The record set is compromised in its ability to truly represent the parameter |
C | The record set is an estimate |
E | The record set's ability to truly represent the monitored parameter is not known |
F | The record set is not of release quality or contains missing data |
The total volume of water that outflows into the sea from Burdekin River, Haughton River, and Barratta Creek has a quality code of C (estimated) during the 2015–16 year.
Climate grid data
Precipitation and evaporation
Monthly precipitation grids for the region were produced using daily data from approximately 6,500 rain gauge stations across Australia and interpolated to a 0.05 degree (5 km) national grid (Jones et al. 2009). The precipitation at each waterbody (i.e. storages) was estimated from the proportionally weighted average of grid cells that intersected each water feature. The volume was then estimated by multiplying the surface area of each waterbody by the weighted average precipitation. The average monthly surface area of the storages was calculated from daily storage levels and capacity tables.
Evaporation from water bodies was calculated on a daily basis using the Morton's shallow lake formulation (Morton 1983a, 1983b, 1986). For annual evaporation estimate, there is no difference between shallow and deep lake evaporation (Sacks et al. 1994). The climate data required for the Morton's method are maximum temperature, minimum temperature, vapour pressure and solar radiation. The climate data for each waterbody (i.e. storages) was estimated from the proportionally weighted average of grid cells that intersected each water feature and input to the Morton's program to obtain the evaporation values. The volume was then estimated by multiplying the surface area of each waterbody by the evaporation values.
The limitations associated with this approach are:
- The dynamic storage surface areas calculated from the levels and capacity tables represent a monthly average and therefore, will not capture changes that occur on a shorter temporal scale.
- The total surface area of the surface water store within the Burdekin region included only the storages and not the rivers, lakes or wetlands.
- The evaporation and precipitation values calculated, did not take into account a 19,700 ML portion of the total volume. This volume represents the aggregated storage capacities of Blue Valley Weir, Bowen River Weir, Gorge Weir, Val Bird Weir, and Charters Towers Weir. This accounts for less than 1% of the total storage capacity; therefore, the evaporation and precipitation values calculated can be regarded as slightly conservative.
Uncertainty estimates were not available for the modelled precipitation and evaporation estimates by the Bureau.
Runoff
Runoff to surface water in the Burdekin region was based on a combination of observed streamflow data and streamflow estimates from the AWRA-L model outputs.
The volume of runoff in the catchment area upstream of Lake Dalrymple (approximately 85% of the Burdekin region area) was estimated based on observed streamflow data (Figure N2). The runoff is assumed to equal the sum of flow data from gauging stations along the three primary rivers that flow into Lake Dalrymple.
- Burdekin River at Sellheim (Station 120002C)
- Cape River at Taemas (Station120302B)
- Suttor River at St Anns (Station 120303A).
Figure N2 Gauging stations used to calculate runoff upstream of Lake Dalrymple
The runoff in the remaining 15% of the region was based on AWRA-L model outputs. Using climate grid data for the Burdekin region (including precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation data), the AWRA-L model was used to estimate the runoff depth at each grid point within the 'ungauged' portion of the region. Only runoff from the landscape was considered; therefore, the surface areas of the storages were excluded from the analysis.
The average runoff from the landscape into the connected surface water store was determined as the weighted mean of the relevant grid points within the region boundary. Points were weighted based upon the area they represented within the region to remove edge effects (where the area represented is not wholly within the reporting region) and the effect of changing area represented with changing latitude. Runoff depth was converted to a runoff volume by multiplying runoff depth by the total area of the modelled region (excluding storages).
The approach was subject to the assumptions of the AWRA-L model detailed in Viney et al. 2015.
Managed aquifer recharge
Lower Burdekin Water & DNRM manage the majority of the aquifers in the lower Burdekin delta. SunWater do not manage aquifer recharge (outside the Giru Benefited Area). The expected error associated with this reported volume is +/– 5% but only extends to surface water metering, not GW recharge.
Water resourcing licence database and annual reports/meter readings
Allocation remaining
The water management year commences on the date the licence is issued. In most cases, particularly for individual users, the licence anniversary falls outside the standard water year (1 July–30 June). As a result, the water allocation remaining at the end of the 2015–16 year is the unused component of the annual allocation for the licence. The allocation remaining at 30 June 2016 is calculated as shown in Table N6.
Account | |
Opening balance at 1 July 2015 | |
add | Allocation |
less | Allocated abstraction |
less | Adjustment and forfeiture |
equals | Closing balance at 30 June 2016 |
Adjustment and forfeiture
The portion of groundwater allocation that has not been abstracted at the end of the licence water year is forfeited (i.e., there is no carryover of entitlements). Therefore, forfeiture is calculated as the total annual allocation for each licence minus the allocation abstraction during the licence water year. Individual user entitlements that are terminated during the year are also considered to be forfeitures. Remaining surface water allocation for individual users and irrigation are carried over.
Allocations
Queensland water licences are issued with an annual abstraction amount specified and with annual compliance arrangements in place.
The maximum amount of abstraction under a water entitlement is announced by the resource operations licence holder on an annual basis. The announced allocation is made after a review of storage and aquifer levels in the region on the first day of the water year (1 July). Subsequent additional announcements may be made throughout the year if additional water becomes available.
More information on these allocations and the associated water access entitlement is given in the Water rights, entitlements, allocations and restrictions note
Allocation abstraction: individual users
The entitled abstraction of allocated water by individual users (both surface water and groundwater) during the licenced water year is derived from volumetric charging (metered data).
The expected error associated with metered data is +/– 5%. SunWater requires that all water meters, when tested under in situ conditions, must be within 5% accuracy across the full flow rate range. The uncertainty of the estimated data is unquantified.
Allocated diversion: urban water system
The entitled abstraction of allocated water for the urban water system during the licensed water year is based on measured data collected at the outlet of the water source using a cumulative water meter.
The expected error associated with these abstractions is +/– 5%. SunWater requires that all water meters, when tested under in situ conditions, must be within 5% accuracy across the full flow rate range.
Allocated diversion: irrigation
Most of the entitled diversion of allocated surface water in the Burdekin region is for irrigation scheme water supply. The entitled diversion of allocated water for Irrigation combines total report volumes from the Bowen Broken and Burdekin Haughton water supply schemes. The expected error associated with these diversions is +/– 5%. SunWater requires that all water meters, when tested under in situ conditions, must be within 5% accuracy across the full flow rate range.