25.1 Unaccounted-for difference

Supporting information

In the Melbourne region, the unaccounted-for difference is the volume necessary to reconcile the opening water storage and closing water storage with the total water inflows and total water outflows reported in the water accounting statements. It is calculated according to the following table.

Calculation of the unaccounted-for-difference for the 2012–13 year


Volume (ML)

Opening water storage at 1 July 2012


Total water inflows


Total water outflows


Closing water storage at 30 June 2013


Unaccounted-for difference


The unaccounted-for difference can also be calculated by summing the volumes necessary to reconcile (balance) the opening and closing storage with the water inflows and outflows of each of the separate water stores of the region, as shown in the following table.

Balancing item volumes for the Melbourne region for the 2012–13 year

Balancing item

Volume (ML)

Balancing item–surface water store


Balancing item–groundwater store


Balancing item–urban water system store


Unaccounted-for difference


Detail of the balancing items calculation is given in the following Water resources and systems notes:

  • Surface water note (Table 4)
  • Groundwater note (Table 8)
  • Urban system note (Table 13)

The second table above shows that the unaccounted-for difference volume can be attributed to the balancing items of the groundwater store and the surface water store.

The surface water balancing item is attributed to river and floodplain losses not being quantified, as well as uncertainty associated with runoff and river outflow. In particular, in the quantification of rainfall runoff there is uncertainty in the meteorological inputs into the model and the model structure. Similarly, for river outflow to sea, there is uncertainty associated with the rating curves and the ungauged runoff which enters the sea.

The groundwater balancing item is estimated using a water balance approach and the relatively high unaccounted for volume can be attributed to a number of factors:

  • The groundwater asset of the Melbourne region is based on the long-term groundwater volume available for extraction–the permissible consumptive volume (PCV). The PCV is essentially constant from year to year and is therefore insensitive to groundwater level fluctuations. In contrast, groundwater inflows and outflows consider the annual fluctuations in groundwater levels.
  • The PCV is defined for water table and underlying aquifers of key groundwater management units only. The influence of the remaining groundwater areas in the Melbourne region is therefore not well represented.
  • Several of the groundwater inflows and outflow volumes were modelled. In particular, recharge from landscape represents the volume of water that could potentially reach the water table given the rainfall, land use, and soil type in the region. This modelled volume is not a direct measure of groundwater recharge as it does not take into consideration the time lag that occurs between the rainfall infiltrating into the soil and actually reaching the water table. In addition surface water–groundwater interactions were not quantified for the region due to lack of appropriate methodology for an annual estimation.