10.3 Recharge from landscape

Supporting information

a. Supporting Information

The volume reported in the water accounting statements (1,194,424 ML) represents the total volume of groundwater recharge from the landscape within the Perth region during the 2012–13 year.

Groundwater recharge from the landscape into each aquifer for the two model areas during the 2012–13 year are given in the following table.


Volume of groundwater recharge from the landscape within the Perth region during the 2012–13 year


Recharge (ML)

Groundwater store

Perth area

Peel–Harvey area

water table aquifer



underlying aquifer—Leederville



underlying aquifer—Yarragadee






Total volume of rainfall over the entire landscape of the Perth region was 12,397,416 ML during the 2012–13 year (derived by multiplying the area-averaged rainfall of 586 mm [see Climate overview] by the area of the region [21,156 km2]). This means that approximately 10% of the total annual rainfall over the Perth region contributed to groundwater recharge.

Recharge from landscape was approximately 456,000 ML less than that reported during the 2011–12 year. This decrease reflects the below average rainfall conditions observed throughout the region during the 2012–13 year (see Climate overview) compared to the average rainfall recorded during the comparison year (see the 2012 Account).

b. Groundwater models

The Department of Water use the Perth Regional Aquifer Modelling System (PRAMS) version 3.4 and Peel–Harvey Regional Aquifer Modelling System (PHRAMS) to estimate the natural water movement to and from the groundwater store within the Perth region.

As shown in the following figure, PRAMS estimates groundwater movement for the area north of Mandurah. PHRAMS estimates groundwater movement for the Peel–Harvey area south of Mandurah. The volumes reported in this account refer to the natural water movement that occurs within each model area within the Perth region boundary.

Map of groundwater model areas relative to the Perth region boundary
Map of groundwater model areas relative to the Perth region boundary

Quantification approach

Data source

PRAMS version 3.4 and PHRAMS groundwater models.

Provided by

Department of Water.


PRAMS calculates the recharge of water into the Perth region aquifers from the unsaturated zone above (i.e., the landscape store). The model delineates a series of horizontal cells called representative recharge units, and collates data on:

  • land use, vegetation classifications, leaf area indexes and soil classifications (spatial datasets)
  • water table depths and plant root depths
  • climatic data throughout the region.

The CSIRO WAVES model was then used to calculate flows from some of the specific land use areas, such as agriculture, pine plantations and native bushland (simpler models are used for general land use areas including residential, industrial and parkland areas). The Vertical Flux Model calculates recharge on a daily basis and MODFLOW was used to do the time step calculation.

PHRAMS calculates the inflow of water into the Peel–Harvey model area and assumes that most of the inflow is recharge from rainfall. The CSIRO WAVES model is used to estimate the maximum annual recharge based on the following equation:

            Recharge = 0.8 x Rainfall – 280

The annual recharge and annual pan evaporation were distributed into monthly amounts using a monthly distribution table. The monthly accounts were then applied to the specific geological areas (which have their own recharge rates according to soil types and land cover) to calculate total recharge.

Assumptions, limitations, caveats and approximations

The two groundwater models use different techniques to calculate recharge. PRAMS is a more complicated and sophisticated model than PHRAMS. PRAMS uses daily climatic data to determine total recharge during the year, whereas PHRAMS is based on annual data inputs.

Both models were initially developed for the purpose of estimating and assessing the impacts of changes in climatic conditions and varying extraction rates on the aquifers, not for the purposes of preparing water accounts. These models have since been modified to also provide data for water accounting.

Uncertainty information

The uncertainty estimate was not quantified.