Murray–Darling Basin
9.4 Runoff to surface water

Supporting information

The volumetric value for the line item for the 2012–13 year was 25,143,874 ML.

The line item represents runoff volumes to surface water within the Murray–Darling Basin (MDB) region.  River losses have not been included in this line item.  They are included in line item 17.10 River and floodplain leakage, evaporation and errors.

Rainfall runoff volumes to surface water within the MDB region are summarised in the following table.

 

Details of rainfall runoff to surface water in the MDB region for the 2012–13 year

Water resource plan area

Sustainable diversion limit area

State/Territory

 Volume (ML) for the 2012–13 year 

Code

Name

SW20 Warrego–Paroo–Nebine

SS29

Paroo 

Qld

4,358,448

SS28

Warrego 

Qld

SS27

Nebine 

Qld

SW19 Condamine–Balonne

SS26

Condamine–Balonne 

Qld

SW18 Moonie

SS25

Moonie 

Qld

SW12 Barwon–Darling Watercourse

SS19

Barwon–Darling Watercourse 

NSW

SW12 NSW Intersecting Streams

SS17

NSW Intersecting Streams

NSW

SW17 Qld Border Rivers

SS24

Qld Border Rivers 

Qld

2,208,273

SW16 NSW Border Rivers

SS23

NSW Border Rivers 

NSW

SW15 Gwydir

SS22

Gwydir

NSW

1,061,710

SW14 Namoi

SS21

Namoi 

NSW

1,262,186

SW11 Macquarie–Castlereagh

SS20

Macquarie–Castlereagh 

NSW

1,788,890

Northern Basin

10,679,507

SW10 Lachlan

SS16

Lachlan 

NSW

1,863,603

SW9 Murrumbidgee 

SS15

Murrumbidgee  NSW

NSW

2,590,354

SW1 ACT

SS1

ACT

ACT

SW8 NSW Murray and Lower Darling

SS18

Lower Darling 

NSW

6,055,919

SS14

NSW Murray

NSW

SW2 Vic. Murray

SS3

Kiewa

Vic.

SS2

Vic. Murray 

Vic.

SW4 Wimmera–Mallee 

SS9

Wimmera–Mallee 

Vic.

SW5 SA Murray Region

SS10

SA Non-prescribed areas 

SA

SW6 SA River Murray

SS11

SA Murray

SA

SW3 Northern Victoria

SS4

Ovens 

Vic.

1530877

SS5

Broken 

Vic.

1,975,874

SS6

Goulburn

Vic.

SS7

Campaspe 

Vic.

136898

SS8

Loddon

Vic.

161154

SW7 Eastern Mount Lofty Ranges 

SS13

Eastern Mount Lofty Ranges 

SA

149,688

SS12

Marne Saunders 

SA

Southern Basin

14,464,367

Whole MDB region

25,143,874


Quantification approach

Data source

(1) Bureau of Meteorology (the Bureau): (a) National Climate Centre (NCC) daily climate grids (rainfall, temperature and solar radiation) and (b) Australian Hydrological Geospatial Fabric (AHGF) waterbody feature class; (2) Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO): (a) Australian water resources assessment system landscape model (AWRA-L) model parameters and (b) CSIRO monthly climatological average radiation grids data; and (3) Geoscience Australia: MDB human-made waterbody feature class.

Provided by

The Bureau.

Method

Rainfall runoff to surface water was estimated based on the AWRA-L version 3.0 (Van Dijk 2010) model outputs.

  • Using climate grid data for the MDB region (including precipitation, temperature and solar radiation data), AWRA-L was used to estimate the runoff depth at each grid point within the region. Only runoff from the landscape is considered; therefore, the surface areas of the major storages, local catchment storages and other mapped waterbodies were excluded from the analysis.

Runoff from the landscape is divided into two components: runoff into the surface water store (major storages, rivers and drains) and runoff into local catchment storages. Only runoff into the surface water store is considered here.

The average runoff depth from the landscape into the surface water was determined as the weighted mean of the relevant grid-points within the MDB region boundary. Points were weighted based upon the area they represented within the region to remove edge effects (where the area represented is not wholly within the MDB region) and the effect of changing area represented with changing latitude.  Mean runoff depth was converted to a runoff volume by multiplying runoff depth by the total area of the region (excluding storages). 

Assumptions, limitations, caveats and approximations

  • The estimated runoff was compared against historical flows at unimpaired catchments within the MDB region for the 2012–13 year and provided a suitable representation of the runoff for this year.
  • The runoff estimates were subject to the assumptions of the AWRA-L model detailed in Van Dijk (2010).
  • The estimated runoff corresponds to the runoff expected from an unimpaired catchment. The impairment on runoff from local catchment storages is estimated using a local catchment storage water balance model. Where this is applied, the runoff estimates inherit the approximations, assumptions and caveats of the local catchment storage water balance model and the parameters used.

Uncertainty information

The uncertainty estimate was not quantified.

Comparative year

A prior period error and a change made to the calculation method resulted in the restatement of the 2011–12 year volume. The respective volumes associated with the change are detailed in the following table.


Restatement of comparative year information made for the line item 9.4 Runoff to surface water
Segment

2013 Account volume for the 2011–12 year (ML)

2012 Account volume for the 2011–12 year (ML)

Difference due to  a prior period error and calculation method change (ML)

Northern Basin 27,429,924 32,492,437 (5,062,513)
Southern Basin 30,168,072 31,090,750 (922,678)
Whole region 57,597,996 63,583,187 (5,985,191)


The volume of runoff estimated for the comparison year for the 2013 Account is lower than the volume reported for the 2012 Account. This was due to the following reasons:

  • There was a prior period error in the line item volume reported in the 2012 Account. The prior period error was a result of using solar radiation data with bias correction errors. Solar radiation is an input for line item volume calculation.
  • The difference between the previously reported estimate of runoff and the estimate produced for the comparison year can be partly attributed to the choice of the AWRA-L v3.0 model instead of the previously used AWRA-L v2.0. The AWRA-L v3.0 model is more reliable than previous models in estimating runoff.

The difference between the previously reported estimate of runoff and the estimate produced for the comparison year represents a change of approximately 9% of the previously reported value. It is not possible to estimate the difference separately for each reason.