Bureau of Meteorology logo
 
                           

Adelaide

                                                                                                   

30.3 Unaccounted-for difference—groundwater store

                             

Supporting information   


The unaccounted-for difference is the difference between the directly measured closing water asset and the closing water asset calculated from the statement of physical flows. The total unaccounted-for difference in the Adelaide water accounting statement is 220,348 ML or about 150% of the total water assets. In general this large difference is due to:

  • uncertainty in the line items arising from the quantification approaches
  • extent to which assets and flows in the water accounting statements represent the physical system.

The unaccounted-for difference for the individual stores in the Adelaide region is presented in the table below.

Store

Measured/estimated (ML)

Calculatedfrom physical flows (ML)

Difference (ML)

Difference (%)

Connected surface water

110,546

72,369

(38,365)

(35)

Groundwater

39,268

308,620

269,352

686

Water distribution system

1,676

(9,709)

(10,639)

(635)

Total water assets

151,490

372,412

220,348

146

The unaccounted-for difference for the groundwater store is calculated according to the table below.

Calculation

Line item

Volume (ML)

 

Opening balance (as at 1 July 2009)

Groundwater Store

39,268

add

TOTAL 14 Groundwater inflows

405,942

minus

TOTAL 16 Groundwater outflows

136,590

minus

Closing balance (as at 30 June 2010)

Groundwater store

39,268

 

Unaccounted-for difference

269,352

The groundwater store has the greatest unaccounted-for difference (269,352 ML) due to:

  • only partial quantification of the groundwater asset. Only the allocated groundwater asset in prescribed areas with a water management plan has been quantified. The extractable portion of groundwater in areas covered by a Notice of Prohibition and in areas not declared as prescribed has not been quantified. In contrast, groundwater flows (e.g. recharge and extraction) have been quantified for the entire region.
  • exclusion of some significant flows (e.g. recharge from surface water, groundwater evapotranspiration and discharge)
  • large uncertainty associated with some groundwater terms (e.g. diffuse recharge and regional flow).