Bureau of Meteorology logo
 
                           

Murray–Darling Basin

                                                                                                   

14.7.2.7 Allocation diversion of regulated flows – high-security, other lumped holders

                             

Supporting information   


The volumetric value for the line item is 335,150 ML (see the following table for the breakdown of the value).

Allocation diversion of regulated flows made under high-security – other lumped holder category in the Murray–Darling Basin (MDB) region during 2009–10

Region no.

Region name

State

Volume

(ML)

5

Border Rivers

Qld/NSW

191

5.1

Border Rivers – Qld

Qld

n/a

5.2

Border Rivers – NSW

NSW

191

6

Gwydir

NSW

9,482

7

Namoi

NSW

265

8

Macquarie–Castlereagh

NSW

8,325

10

Lower Darling

NSW

3,463

11

Lachlan

NSW

2,603

12

Wimmera–Avoca

Vic

13

Ovens

Vic

14

Goulburn–Broken

Vic

15

Loddon

Vic

16

Campaspe

Vic

17

Murrumbidgee

NSW/ACT

221,772

17.1

Murrumbidgee – NSW

NSW

221,772

17.2

Murrumbidgee – ACT

ACT

n/a

18

Murray

NSW/Vic/SA

89,049

18.1

Murray – NSW

NSW

89,049

18.2

Murray – Vic

Vic

18.3

Murray – SA

SA

n/a

 

Total

335,150

– = no data available; n/a = not applicable

New South Wales volumes include the licence class of high-security diversions for:

  • bulk (i.e. within irrigation trusts) and individual irrigation
  • environment
  • where the purpose is generally not known.

No information specific to this entitlement class available for Victoria. See Line item 14.7.9.7 Allocation diversion of regulated flows – other lumped holders for data on all classes lumped together.

In Queensland, the resource operation plans (ROPs) distinguish between ‘high and medium priority of supplemented water allocation’ (names used in Queensland, corresponding to high and general/low-security classes of water access entitlements, respectively, in the National Water Account 2010, or the 2010 Account). In most cases, what the ROPs classify as high priority actually corresponds to urban purpose. The WAM data, however, only distinguish between ‘supplemented’ and ‘unsupplemented’ entitlements, distinguishing for ‘supplemented’ only, urban purpose from all other purposes. For this reason, the 2010 Account reports all ‘supplemented’ entitlements in Queensland under ‘other lumped WAE’ class. The 2010 Account further splits Queensland ‘supplemented’ entitlements between urban purpose, reported under ‘urban holder’ (Line item 14.7.9.4), and all other purposes, reported under ‘individual irrigator holder (Line item 14.7.9.2) and ‘other lumped holders’ (Line item 14.7.9.7).

No other state has high or general/low-security classes of entitlements.

Quantification approach   


Data source

  • Australian Capital Territory: Water Audit Monitoring Report 2009–10 (30 November 2010).
  • New South Wales: NSW Office of Water’s Water Accounting section.
  • Queensland: Water Audit Monitoring Report 2009–10 (31 January 2011).
  • South Australia: Water Audit Monitoring Report 2009–10 (22 February 2011).
  • Victoria: Water Audit Monitoring Report 2009–10 (19 January 2011).

Note: Water audit monitoring (WAM) report data are stored in the Murray–Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) HYDRO database.

Data provider

MDBA.

Method

NSW Office of Water supplied data are prepared on a water balance approach. It implies that the movement of values during the year will balance the opening and closing balances. The forfeitures and adjustments have been checked to ensure that the closing balance reconciles.

Uncertainty

The uncertainty estimate is +/–10%.

Approximations, assumptions, caveats/limitations

  • This item contains only New South Wales data.
  • Victorian and Queensland WAM data received by MDBA did not allow separation into high and general/low-security classes.
  • Estimates of uncertainty of the diversions are indicative accuracy of bulk diversions at the abstraction point on the river only and do not provide an uncertainty of diversion at the diversion point.
  • Uncertainty reported for diversion at the abstraction point account for possible errors in the data collection process.
  • Uncertainty of diversion at the diversion point: a single metered abstraction point may provide water to a range of users, under various types of entitlements (e.g. stock and domestic class). When this happens, the jurisdiction may split the metered abstraction into several classes of entitlements or types of users, according to priority rules governing the entitlements. This split has an inherent uncertainty that is not considered here.