Bureau of Meteorology logo
 
                           

South East Queensland

                                                                                                   

14.7.2.4 Allocation diversion of regulated flows — high security, urban holder

                             

Supporting information   


The table below shows a breakdown of the volume of surface water taken for on-grid water supply in each water resource plan (WRP) area within the South East Queensland (SEQ) region where the water treatment plant (WTP) sources water from a water supply scheme (WSS).

Volume of water abstracted from surface water for on-grid water supply
Water Resource Plan (WRP) area Water Supply Scheme (WSS) Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Volume (ML)
Gold Coast Nerang Molendinar 38,085
Mudgeeraba 19,372
Total Gold Coast WRP area 57,457
Logan Basin Warrill Valley Boonah–Kalbah 627
Logan River Helen Street 616
Rathdowney 28
South Maclean 1,044
Total Logan Basin WRP area 2,315
Moreton Pine Valley North Pine 23,301
Central Brisbane and Stanley Mount Crosby (combined) 92,654
Total Moreton WRP area 115,955
Total SEQ region 175,727

For the purpose of the National Water Account 2010, the high-security urban holders class only includes the SEQ Water Grid Manager entitlement allocations, as they have been identified as the urban holder of high-security entitlements in the resource operation plans (ROPs). Other organisations may hold high-security entitlements for some form of urban use, but as urban use is not identified on entitlements, these could not readily be identified. For this reason, a small number of entitlements that may fall into this category are included in line item 25.1.97 Allocation announcement on regulated flow – other lumped holder.

The SEQ Water Grid Manager holds high-security (high-priority, for the Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management) entitlements with a volume greater than the historical urban diversion on these entitlements. High-security entitlements are given the same announced allocation percentage for a given WSS, and therefore the SEQ Water Grid Manager does not obtain any preference over any other high-security entitlement holder.

The 2009-10 reporting period represented a transition from a drought-dominated period to a wet period. In the previous years, water storages were at low levels and, if entitlements were administered in the same manner as currently, under the newly established ROPs, low announced allocation percentages would have been given to high-security entitlements such as those held by the SEQ Water Grid Manager.

Although urban demand has some elasticity through water restrictions and habit modification, the extent of urban demand elasticity is not sufficient to counter the variations in announced allocation. In wet years such as the 2009-10 reporting year, when announced allocation percentages are high, significant forfeiture of SEQ Water Grid Manager allocations will occur.

The table below shows the surface water allocation carryover reconciliation.

Surface water allocation carryover reconciliation for year ending 30 June 2010
Allocation category Opening balance (ML) Announcement (ML) Allocation diversion (ML) Forfeiture (ML) Closing balance (ML)
High-security urban 0 422,930 175,727 247,203 0
High-security other 0 20,860 20,324 64,682 0
General-security other 4,534 71,288 11,676

 

Quantification approach   


Data source

Queensland Water Commission (QWC), WaterHub database.

 

Data provider

QWC.

 

Method

The volume of water abstracted from surface water under high-security allocations (defined as high priority in the Water Allocations Register) held by the SEQ Water Grid Manager was estimated based on the volume of water produced at on-grid WTPs. The on-grid WTP metered outputs were obtained from the WaterHub database by the QWC.

 

Uncertainty

Derived from measured data. Estimated uncertainty is +/– 20%.

 

Approximations, assumptions, caveats and limitations

The volume reported for surface water diversions to WTPs does not consider water loss in the raw water trunk mains or through the treatment processes. Therefore, the volume reported may be a slight underestimate of water extracted from the source.