Daly
Water resources and systems

Introduction

The following set of notes provides consolidated reports for each of the water stores and systems within the Daly region during the 2012–13 year. The water stores and systems included in the region are shown in Figure 1.

For more information about the region, please refer to the General description section of the 'Contextual information'.


Figure 1  Schematic diagram of the water stores and systems within the Daly region
Figure 1  Schematic diagram of the water stores and systems within the Daly region


Information on all water flows to and from each water store and system are presented in this note, including between-store flows and transfers that are not presented in the water accounting statements. The between-store flows and transfers that occur in the region are presented in Figure 2.

The numbers on the diagram refer to the line item numbers in the water store notes. For each between-store flow, there are two line item numbers: one refers to flow out of a water store and the other refers to flow into a water store.


Figure 2  Schematic diagram of between-store flows that occur within the Daly region. Line item numbers are provided next to the flows.
Figure 2  Schematic diagram of between-store flows that occur within the Daly region. Line item numbers are provided next to the flows.


The between-store flows and transfers (Figure 2), which are eliminated from the region's water accounting statements, are shown in italics throughout the following set of notes.

Surface water

Background

A description of the Daly region's surface water resources is provided in the Surface water section of the 'Contextual information'.

Water in store

While good information exists on water movement to and from the surface water store (see following section on 'Changes in water store'), only limited data are available for the volume of water in the store. No value could be estimated for the volume in 1.2 Unregulated river, indicated by a dash ('–') for  in Table 1, which is the largest component of the surface water asset. The volume of water in lakes and wetlands (1.4 Lakes and wetlands) also could not be quantified due to a lack of available data.

The Statement of Water Assets and Water Liabilities for the surface water store (Table 1) shows that total surface water liabilities decreased marginally during the 2012–13 year in the Daly region. 


Table 1 Statement of Water Assets and Water Liabilities for the surface water store
Water assets Volume at 30 June 2013
(ML)
Volume at 30 June 2012
(ML)
1 Surface water  
1.1 Storages 413 500
1.2 Unregulated river
1.4 Lakes and wetlands

Total surface water assets 413 500
   
Water liabilities  
5 Surface water liability  
5.1 Surface water allocation remaining 3,351 3,549
5.2 Surface water allocation remaining – urban water system 2,961 3,010
Total surface water liabilities 6,312 6,559
   
Opening net water assets (6,059) (6,076)
Change in net water assets 160 17
Closing net water assets (5,899) (6,059)


Changes in water store

The Statement of Changes in Water Assets and Water Liabilities and the Statement of Water Flows for the surface water store are provided in Table 2 and Table 3 respectively.


Table 2  Statement of Changes in Water Assets and Water Liabilities for the surface water store
Water asset increases 2012–13 volume
(ML)

2011–12 volume
(ML)
9 Surface water increases
 
9.1 Precipitation on surface water 103
32,132
9.3 Groundwater discharge 951,000
1,219,000
9.4 Runoff to surface water 7,131,000
30,590,000
9.6 Overbank flood return to river channel
9.9 Discharge from urban water system 131
114
Total surface water increases 8,082,234
31,841,246
 
 
Water liability decreases
 
13 Surface water liability decreases
 
13.1 Adjustment and forfeiture of surface water allocation 3,053
3,137
13.2 Adjustment and forfeiture of surface water allocation – urban water system 1,012
1,070
Total surface water liability decreases 4,065
4,207
 
 
Water asset decreases
 
17  Surface water decreases
 
17.1 Evaporation from surface water 38,130
33,137
17.2 River outflow from the region 6,146,000
9,698,000
17.3 Leakage to groundwater 23,000
65,000
17.5 Overbank flood spilling
17.6 Surface water diversions – other statutory rights 4,338
4,338
Total surface water decreases 6,211,468
9,800,475
 
 
Water liability increases
 
21 Surface water liability increases
 
21.1 Surface water allocation announcements 3,600
3,651
21.2 Surface water allocation announcements – urban water system 3,417
3,456
Total surface water liability increases 7,017
7,107
 
 
Balancing item—surface water 1,867,654
22,037,854
 
 
Change in net water assets 160
17


Table 3  Statement of Water Flows for the surface water store
Water inflows 2012–13 volume
(ML)

2011–12 volume
(ML)
9 Surface water inflows
 
9.1 Precipitation on surface water 103
32,132
9.3 Groundwater discharge 951,000
1,219,000
9.4 Runoff to surface water 7,131,000
30,590,000
9.6 Overbank flood return to river channel
9.9 Discharge from urban water system 131
114
Total surface water inflows 8,082,234
31,841,246
 
 
Water outflows
 
17 Surface water outflows
 
17.1 Evaporation from surface water 38,130
33,137
17.2 River outflow from the region 6,146,000
9,698,000
17.3 Leakage to groundwater 23,000
65,000
17.5 Overbank flood spilling
17.6 Surface water diversions – other statutory rights 4,338
4,338
17.11 Entitled diversion of allocated surface water to users 745
562
17.12 Entitled diversion of allocated surface water to urban water system 2,454
2,355
Total surface water outflows 6,214,667
9,803,392
 
 
Balancing item—surface water 1,867,654
22,037,854
 
 
Opening water storage 500
500
add Change in water storage (87)
0
Closing water storage 413
500


A schematic diagram representing all the inflows and outflows associated with the surface water store in the Daly region is provided in Figure 3. The numbers in brackets on the diagram refer to the line item numbers in Table 3.


Figure 3 Schematic diagram of water inflows and outflows for the surface water store within the Daly region during the 2012–13 year; line item numbers are provided in brackets
Figure 3 Schematic diagram of water inflows and outflows for the surface water store within the Daly region during the 2012–13 year; line item numbers are provided in brackets


Allocations and diversions

Diversions from surface water are to individual users under statutory rights (17.6 Surface water diversions – other statutory rights), which accounts for approximately 60% of the total diversion (Figure 4). Just over 32% of the diversion from surface water is for Katherine town water supply (17.12 Entitled diversion of allocated surface water to urban water system).


Figure 4 Graph of diversions from surface water within the Daly region during the 2012–13 year; line item numbers are given in brackets
Figure 4 Graph of diversions from surface water within the Daly region during the 2012–13 year; line item numbers are given in brackets


The allocated diversions (line items 17.11 Entitled diversion of allocated surface water to users and 17.12 Entitled diversion of allocated surface water to urban water system ) are associated with a water access entitlement. When an allocation is announced, a present obligation (water liability) is created on the surface water to deliver water to the users. As there is no carry-over provision in the region, the portion of the announced allocations that were not diverted by the end of the year was forfeited.

The entitlement, allocation announcement and forfeiture for each of these water rights during the 2012–13 year are provided in the Surface water rights section of the 'Water access and use' note.


Balancing item

The balancing item volume represents the difference between the measured opening and closing balances of the surface water store, after water inflows and outflows have been applied. This item is an indication of both the accuracy of the volumes reported and the degree to which the reported water flows represents a complete surface water store balance. The closing balance of 413 ML differs from the opening balance of 500 ML because of updated survey information on Copperfield Dam. It is not due to a loss of water. 

The balancing item is calculated according to Table 4.


Table 4  Balancing item for the surface water store for the 2012–13 year

Account Volume (ML)

Opening balance (30 June 2012) 500
add Total surface water inflows (see Table 3) 8,082,234
minus Total surface water outflows (see Table 3) 6,214,667
minus Closing balance (30 June 2013) 413

Balancing item—surface water
1,867,654


The calculation of the water balance on the surface water store yielded a balancing item of 1,867,654 ML. This is approximately 23% of the total surface water inflows during the 2012–13 year.

The balancing item is primarily attributed to river and floodplain losses (including evaporation and seepage) that are not included in the account. It is likely that these losses are a relatively large source of surface water decrease throughout the region. In addition, the balancing item will also be attributed to uncertainty associated with the runoff (a large source of surface water increase, 9.4 Runoff to surface water). The runoff volume is derived from a rainfall–runoff model and it is reasonable to expect a 20% uncertainty around the estimated runoff volume (+/– 1,400,000 ML).


Groundwater

Background

A description of the Daly region's groundwater resources are provided in the Groundwater section of the 'Contextual information'.

Water in store

While good information exists on water movement to and from the groundwater store (see following section on 'Changes in water store'), no value is available for the volume of water in the aquifers. No value could be estimated for the volume of the groundwater asset either, indicated by dashes ('–') in Table 5. Given that the volume of groundwater within the region is unknown, the Department of Land Resource Management derive allocations for groundwater extraction based on the predicted volume of flow in the Katherine River at the end of the dry season (1 November). The predicted flow is made using models fitted for the region to ensure groundwater is not over-allocated.

The Statement of Water Assets and Water Liabilities for the groundwater store is shown in Table 5.


Table 5  Statement of Water Assets and Water Liabilities for the groundwater store
Water assets Volume at 30 June 2013
(ML)

Volume at 30 June 2012
(ML)
2 Groundwater
 
2.1 Water table aquifer
2.2 Underlying aquifers
Total groundwater assets
 
 
Water liabilities
 
6 Groundwater liability
 
6.1 Groundwater allocation remaining 58,205
57,239
6.2 Groundwater allocation remaining – urban water system 3,941
3,940
Total groundwater liabilities 62,146
61,179
 
 
Opening net water assets (61,179)
(61,828)
Change in net water assets (967)
649
Closing net water assets (62,146)
(61,179)


Changes in water store

The Statement of Changes in Water Assets and Water Liabilities and the Statement of Water Flows for the groundwater store are provided in Table 6 and Table 7, respectively.


Table 6  Statement of Changes in Water Assets and Water Liabilities for the groundwater store
Water asset increases 2012–13 volume
(ML)

2011–12 volume
(ML)
10 Groundwater increases
 
10.1 Groundwater inflow from outside region 10,000
11,000
10.2 Groundwater inflow from outside region at coast
10.3 Recharge from landscape 335,000
2,970,000
10.4 Recharge from surface water 23,000
65,000
10.6 Leakage from urban water system
Total groundwater increases 368,000
3,046,000
 
 
Water liability decreases
 
14 Groundwater liability decreases
 
14.1 Adjustment and fortfeiture of groundwater allocation 47,360
46,294
14.2 Adjustment and forfeiture of groundwater allocation – urban water system 3,335
3,291
Total groundwater liability decreases 50,695
49,585
 
 
Water asset decreases
 
18 Groundwater decreases
 
18.1 Groundwater outflow to outside region 0
0
18.2 Groundwater outflow to outside region at coast
18.3 Discharge to landscape
18.4 Discharge to surface water 951,000
1,219,000
18.7 Groundwater extractions – other statutory rights 4,285
4,275
18.8 Entitled extraction of non-allocated groundwater to users 180
1,170
Total groundwater decreases 955,465
1,224,445
 
 
Water liability increases
 
22 Groundwater liability increases
 
22.1 Groundwater allocation announcements 60,099
60,099
22.2 Groundwater allocation announcements – urban water system 4,076
4,076
Total groundwater liability increases 64,175
64,175
 
 
Balancing item—groundwater (599,978)
1,806,316
 
 
Change in net water assets (967)
649


Table 7  Statement of Water Flows for the groundwater store
Water inflows 2012–13 volume
(ML)

2011–12 volume
(ML)
10 Groundwater inflows
 
10.1 Groundwater inflow from outside region 10,000
11,000
10.2 Groundwater inflow from outside region at coast
10.3 Recharge from landscape 335,000
2,970,000
10.4 Recharge from surface water 23,000
65,000
10.6 Leakage from urban water system
Total groundwater inflows 368,000
3,046,000
 
 
Water outflows
 
18 Groundwater outflows
 
18.1 Groundwater outflow to outside region 0
0
18.2 Groundwater outflow to outside region at coast
18.3 Discharge to landscape
18.4 Discharge to surface water 951,000
1,219,000
18.7 Groundwater extractions – other statutory rights 4,285
4,275
18.8 Entitled extraction of non-allocated groundwater to users 180
1,170
18.11 Entitled extraction of allocated groundwater to users 11,773
14,482
18.12 Entitled extraction of allocated groundwater to urban water system 740
757
Total groundwater outflows 967,978
1,239,684
 
 
Balancing item—groundwater (599,978)
1,806,316
 
 
Opening water storage
add Change in water storage 0
0
Closing water storage


A schematic diagram representing all the inflows and outflows associated with the groundwater store in the Daly region is provided in Figure 5. The numbers in brackets on the diagram refer to the line item numbers in Table 7.


Figure 5 Schematic diagram of water inflows and outflows for the groundwater store within the Daly region during the 2012–13 year; line item numbers are provided in brackets
Figure 5 Schematic diagram of water inflows and outflows for the groundwater store within the Daly region during the 2012–13 year; line item numbers are provided in brackets


Some line items show a substantial decrease in volumes between the 2011–12 year and the 2012–13 year such as 10.3 Recharge from landscape and 18.4 Discharge to surface water. This can be attributed to the difference in weather patterns experienced between the wet seasons. The 2011–12 year rainfall was average to above average (see Climate overview from the 2012 Account). The rainfall patterns of this season was characterised by monsoonal rainfall thorughout much of the season. These heavy periods of rain caused rapid movement of water through the catchment. The 2012–13 wet season exhibited a very different pattern. The wet season as a whole recorded an average rainfall, but this was characterised by long dry periods interspersed with short, wet bursts. These rainfall patterns limited the amount of water movement and resulted in much less recharge and discharge.



Allocation and extractions

Most of the extractions from the groundwater store are for licensed private use (18.11 Entitled extraction of allocated groundwater to users), which accounts for 70% of the total extraction (Figure 6). The majority of the allocated private water extractions are for agricultural use. Approximately 4% of the extraction from aquifers is for Katherine town water supply (18.12 Entitled extraction of allocated groundwater to urban water system).


Figure 6 Graph of extractions from aquifers within the Daly region during the 2012–13 year; line item numbers are given in brackets
Figure 6 Graph of extractions from aquifers within the Daly region during the 2012–13 year; line item numbers are given in brackets


The allocated diversions (line items 18.11 Entitled extraction of allocated groundwater to users and 18.12 Entitled extraction of allocated groundwater to urban water system) are associated with water access entitlements. When an allocation is announced, a present obligation (water liability) is created on the surface water to deliver water to the users. As there is no carry-over provision in the region, the portion of the announced allocations that were not diverted by the end of the year was forfeited. Current allocations and extractions represent a very small proportion of the recharge and discharge of the groundwater asset and therefore it is unlikely that they will be a cause of concern in relation to a decline in the net water asset.

The entitlement, allocation announcement and forfeiture for each of these water rights during the 2012–13 year are provided in the Groundwater rights section of the 'Water access and use' note.


Balancing item

The balancing item volume represents the difference between the measured opening and closing balances of the groundwater store, after water inflows and outflows have been applied. This item is an indication of both the accuracy of the volumes reported and the degree to which the reported water flows represents a complete groundwater store balance.

The balancing item is calculated according to Table 8.


Table 8  Balancing item for the groundwater store for the 2012–13 year

Account Volume (ML)

Opening balance (30 June 2012)
add Total groundwater inflows (see Table 7) 368,000
minus Total groundwater outflows (see Table 7) 967,978
minus Closing balance (30 June 2013)

Balancing item—groundwater
(599,978)


The calculation of the water balance on the groundwater store yielded a balancing item of (599,978) ML.

Although the volume in the groundwater stores within the Daly region could not be quantified (2.1 Water table aquifer and 2.2 Underlying aquifers), the Department of Land Resource Management were able to estimate the change in groundwater store during the 2012–13 year based on groundwater model outputs. The estimated change in groundwater store of (599,978) ML is the same as the balancing item for the groundwater store.

Therefore, it is considered that the volume disclosed as the balancing item represents the net change in groundwater store throughout the 2012–13 year. See 25.1 Unaccounted-for difference for a further explanation on this volume and the uncertainty associated with modelling techniques.